Of the molestation allegation, the appellate court docket concluded, "the evidence in help of the allegations remains inconclusive," stated that its "overview of the document militates in opposition to a discovering that Ms. Farrow fabricated the allegations without any basis" and explicitly corrected Wilk by stating that the Yale-New Haven staff's view that Dylan had a tendency to "withdraw right into a fantasy," and that she had given inconsistent accounts, needed to be taken into consideration. Allen recounts a Yale New Haven interview session in which Farrow defined to experts how Dylan was so disturbed by the sexual abuse that she turned to her sister Lark for bodily consolation. Regarding the criticism towards Yale New Haven for having destroyed the original case notes, Allen maintains that that was Yale New Haven's and the FBI's common procedure to preserve privacy. Another criticism was that the staff was unwilling to testify in court docket, except through Leventhal's deposition. One of Allen's attorneys alleged that Farrow's attorneys had steered "the fees may very well be made to go away" if Allen agreed to pay around $7 million. Allen also claims that in the course of the custody trial, a courtroom clerk habitually drove Farrow house from the courthouse and that that was an "unfair conduit to the judge"; referred to Moses's testimony that he witnessed how Farrow coached Dylan; and reported the testimony of a babysitter to whom Dylan said, "Mummy desires me to lie." Allen alleges that long before the allegation of abuse emerged, Farrow took Dylan to a baby therapist because the woman had hassle distinguishing between actuality and fantasy and that, in the midst of household turmoil, Farrow advised to the baby that she had been abused which resulted in Dylan sincerely believing it.
